Skip to main content
. 2002 Jan 15;538(Pt 2):583–597. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013102

Table 2.

Effect of preconditioning either with heat or geldanamycin on changes in arterial pH and calculated base deficit in control and haemorrhaged rats

Baseline End of haemorrhagic shock End of experiment



Experimental conditions n pH BE pH BE pH BE
No preconditioning
Controls – no shock 6 7.41 ± 0.02 1.1 ± 0.6 7.39 ± 0.02 0.9 ± 0.7 7.38 ± 0.01 1.8 ± 0.8
Controls + alveolar adrenaline 3 7.42 ± 0.03 0.5 ± 0.3 7.41 ± 0.03 1.0 ± 0.4 7.39 ± 0.02 2.0 ± 1.0
Haemorrhagic shock 6 7.44 ± 0.02 1.2 ± 0.6 7.24 ± 0.01* −13.3 ± 1.0* 7.39 ± 0.05 2.4 ± 1.3
Haemorrhagic shock + alveolar adrenaline 5 7.41 ± 0.02 1.0 ± 0.5 7.25 ± 0.02* −12.3 ± 1.2* 7.40 ± 0.03 2.0 ± 1.2
Stress preconditioning with heat
Controls + alveolar adrenaline 4 7.43 ± 0.02 0.5 ± 0.8 7.40 ± 0.03 0.7 ± 0.7 7.39 ± 0.02 0.5 ± 1.4
Haemorrhagic shock + alveolar adrenaline 5 7.42 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.5 7.26 ± 0.02* −12.0 ± 1.4* 7.40 ± 0.02 1.3 ± 0.8
Stress preconditioning with geldanamycin
Controls + alveolar adrenaline 4 7.41 ± 0.01 0.8 ± 0.5 7.41 ± 0.04 0.9 ± 0.4 7.38 ± 0.02 1.3 ± 1.1
Haemorrhagic shock + alveolar adrenaline 4 7.43 ± 0.02 0.7 ± 0.5 7.23 ± 0.04* −13.2 ± 1.2* 7.40 ± 0.02 1.3 ± 1.1

Data are given as means ± s.e.m.

*

P < 0.05 vs. controls. BE, base excess.