Table 2.
Desensitization kinetics of cell-attached patches (1 mM ACh)
| Five-component patches, Linear model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k01 | k10 | k12 | k21 | k23 | k32 | k34 | k43 | k45 | k54* | est. N | |
| 46.7 | 644.8 | 844.2 | 113.1 | 56.2 | 11.3 | 7.32 | 0.75 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 53 | |
| 65.7 | 778.9 | 1727.0 | 335.0 | 166.0 | 38.9 | 18.70 | 1.17 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 83 | |
| 67.6 | 969.3 | 303.9 | 61.7 | 48.9 | 6.9 | 1.55 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 21 | |
| 133.0 | 451.2 | 671.6 | 178.0 | 91.7 | 32.5 | 8.30 | 2.39 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 112 | |
| 43.8 | 522.8 | 421.5 | 86.5 | 46.7 | 27.6 | 11.60 | 1.28 | 0.59 | 0.23 | 61 | |
| Mean | 71.4 | 673.4 | 793.6 | 154.9 | 81.9 | 23.4 | 9.49 | 1.22 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 66 |
| s.e.m. | 16.1 | 92.6 | 251.7 | 49.0 | 22.5 | 6.2 | 2.81 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 15 |
| Five-component patches, Star model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k01 | k10 | k02 | k20 | k03 | k30 | k04 | k40 | k05 | k50* | |
| 18.0 | 1601 | 12.4 | 106.6 | 7.3 | 12.2 | 4.09 | 0.55 | 4.99 | 0.11 | |
| 16.6 | 2768 | 17.4 | 272.8 | 15.7 | 31.0 | 5.32 | 1.40 | 10.73 | 0.11 | |
| 48.1 | 1389 | 6.4 | 277.0 | 5.7 | 51.6 | 5.98 | 3.16 | 1.99 | 0.20 | |
| 43.0 | 1246 | 35.8 | 167.9 | 35.3 | 20.7 | 15.10 | 1.84 | 4.57 | 0.32 | |
| 22.1 | 988 | 8.3 | 108.5 | 8.7 | 22.0 | 2.30 | 1.37 | 2.45 | 0.11 | |
| Mean | 30 | 1598 | 16 | 187 | 15 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.7 | 4.9 | 0.15* |
| s.e.m. | 7 | 308 | 5 | 38 | 6 | 7 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.04 |
| Four component patches, Linear model | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k01 | k10 | k12 | k21 | k23 | k32 | k34 | k43* | |
| 38.6 | 302 | 692 | 65.0 | 52.0 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.80 | |
| 68.6 | 433 | 418 | 107.0 | 130.0 | 18.1 | 11.5 | 0.64 | |
| 60.9 | 334 | 565 | 65.6 | 45.2 | 8.8 | 13.8 | 1.46 | |
| 18.6 | 394 | 367 | 54.5 | 18.6 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.08 | |
| 34.0 | 587 | 708 | 169.0 | 61.9 | 14.0 | 6.9 | 0.31 | |
| Mean | 44 | 410 | 549 | 92 | 62 | 9.0 | 6.8 | 0.66 |
| s.e.m. | 9 | 49 | 69 | 21 | 19 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 0.23 |
| Four component patches, Star model | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k01 | k10 | k02 | k20 | k03 | k30 | k04 | k03* | |
| 13.2 | 1398.3 | 11.4 | 134.3 | 5.5 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 0.2 | |
| 29.4 | 919.5 | 13.6 | 186.3 | 8.9 | 16.1 | 16.6 | 0.2 | |
| 20.5 | 946.0 | 12.4 | 74.3 | 7.0 | 16.4 | 21.1 | 0.3 | |
| 8.9 | 789.5 | 5.9 | 46.1 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.0 | |
| 13.2 | 1398.3 | 11.4 | 134.3 | 5.5 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 0.2 | |
| Mean | 17 | 1090 | 11 | 115 | 5.7 | 13 | 9.5 | 0.16 |
| s.e.m. | 4 | 128 | 1 | 25 | 1.2 | 2 | 3.9 | 0.03 |
The kinetic models are shown in Fig. 12 (rate constants, s−1).
The slowest recovery rate constant is predicted to scale linearly with the number of channels in the patch. The number of components refers to the shut interval duration distribution. The estimated number of channels (est. N) in the five-component patches is the ratio of k54 * and the single-channel value of for this rate constant (see Table 4). The number of intervals in each patch is shown in Table 1.