Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 15;542(Pt 2):431–444. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017590

Table 2.

Responses to drugs or native and cloned K+ channels shown as percentage inhibition

Type 1 TASK-1 Type 2 TASK-3 Type 3 TREK-2 Type 4
Ba2+ (3 mm) 65 ± 8 69 ± 8 62 ± 5 58 ± 7 45 ± 12 52 ± 11 95 ± 3
TEA (1 mm) 6 ± 6 8 ± 7 3 ± 5 2 ± 3 2 ± 3 0 ± 3 90 ± 10
4-AP(out;1 mm) 4 ± 6 5 ± 5 1 ± 4 0 ± 3 1 ± 3 0 ± 4 8 ± 9
Apamin (out;100 nm) 2 ± 5 3 ± 4 6 ± 7 5 ± 6 3 ± 4 1 ± 3 1 ± 4
Quinidine (0.1 mm) 45 ± 8 52 ± 6 40 ± 7 38 ± 6 8 ± 6 6 ± 4 86 ± 12
Bupivacaine (0.1 mm) 58 ± 11 54 ± 8 52 ± 6
AA (10 or 20 μm) 32 ± 6 36 ± 8 69 ± 6 63 ± 7 (12 ± 4) (16 ± 6) (4.9 ± 1.7)
GTPγS(10 μm) 32 ± 4 38 ± 6 10 ± 4 8 ± 3 5 ± 6

Each value represents the mean ± s.d. of 3–6 values. Each agent was applied to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane unless indicated otherwise. All mean values above 20 % were significantly different from their respective controls (P < 0.05). Values in parentheses indicate ‘fold’ increase, not percentage inhibition. For more details, see text. AA, arachidonic acid.