Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 20;105(12):4553–4558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710305105

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

GC-EAG with CYP81D11-induced Arabidopsis and A. ervi. Upper trace, response of antenna; lower trace, FID response. Electrophysiologically active peaks are marked with arrows. Tentative identifications based on retention indices and GC-MS: (1) (E)-2-pentenal, (2) (Z)-3-hexenal, (3) hexanal, (4) unidentified, (5) ethylbenzene. Tentative identifications based on retention index only, because of the small amount of material: (6) benzaldehyde/α-pinene, (7) 4-pentyl isothiocyanate/(E)-2-octen-1-ol, (8) unknown, (9) benzathiazole, (10) α-cubebene, (11) isolongifolene/bourbonene, (12) unidentified, (13) 2-tridecanone/germacrene D, (14) 4,8,12-trimethyl-(E,E)-trideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene, (15) unknown.