Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 10;105(12):4639–4644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706849105

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Comparison of no intervention with intervention scenarios 2 and 3 using just NPIs, NPI with addition of just treatment of ascertained cases (Plus Case Treatment), and NPI with addition of treatment of ascertained cases and targeted antiviral prophylaxis (Plus TAP) of their household contacts. Scenario 1: no intervention; scenario 2: just NPI, with treatment only; with TAP (base case scenario 2); scenario 3: just NPI, with treatment only; with TAP and treatment (base case scenario 3); R0 of 1.9 (2.1). Chicago population.