Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 10;105(12):4639–4644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706849105

Table 2.

Illness attack rates (%) and (antiviral courses per 1,000) using scenarios described in Table 1 in the Chicago population

Scenario% compliance/ascertainment Intervention threshold, % R0 = 1.9 (2.1)
R0 = 2.4
R0 = 3.0
Imperial UW VBI Imperial UW VBI Imperial UW VBI
1 NA 42.4(0) 46.8(0) 44.7(0) 52.4(0) 52.4(0) 51.1(0) 58.8(0) 58.8(0) 56.5(0)
2 30/60 1 7.3(104) 2.8(38) 3.9(59.1) 15.5(239) 4.1(61.2) 9.7(140.4) 27.4(421) 8.5(138.4) 20.1(275.1)
3 60/60 0.1 1.1(17.9) 0.31(4.3) 1.3(29.7) 4.1(69.8) 0.41(6.2) 3.2(70.6) 18.1(300) 1.03(17.1) 9.4(189)
4 60/80 0.01 0.22(4.6) 0.040.76) 0.10(3.2) 0.66(14.2) 0.05(1.1) 1.4(41.7) 10.1(210) 0.12(2.5) 3.8(105.9)
5 90/60 0.1 0.17(3.2) 0.30(4.1) 1.2(28.8) 0.66(14.2) 0.30(5.8) 2.7(59.4) 11.5(192) 0.86(14.2) 6.4(132.2)
6 90/80 0.01 0.20(4.2) 0.04(0.76) 0.07(2.3) 0.54(9.4) 0.05(1.0) 1.2(35.5) 5.4(112) 0.11(2.1) 2.8(80.2)

The Imperial/Pitt model results are based on an average of 10 realizations, the UW/LANL results on an average of 5 realizations, and the VBI results mostly on one realization.