Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 21;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-7

Table 1.

Subgroup analysis of the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of the Papanicolaou smear test

Clinical reading (n = 1781) Optimized interpretation (n = 1777)

Variables† n
(%)
Disease prevalence n (%) Sensitivity % Specificity % Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio Sensitivity % Specificity % Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio


HPV test
 Positive 537 (30) 282 (53) 95 76 4.02 0.07 92 76 3.93 0.10
 Negative 1244 (70) 73 (6) 64 93 9.31 0.38 64 93 8.85 0.38
Study setting
 Screening 1320 (74) 70 (5) 70 94 12.32 0.32 75 92 8.96 0.27
 Referral clinic 461 (26) 285 (62) 93 60 2.34 0.12 89 77 3.90 0.14
Age
 <35 years 981 (55) 158 (16) 89 92 11.66 0.12 83 91 9.44 0.19
 ≥ 35 years 800 (45) 197 (25) 88 87 6.79 0.14 89 88 7.37 0.12
Current smoking
 Yes 602 (34) 161 (27) 90 88 7.22 0.11 87 89 7.67 0.15
 No 1161 (66) 188 (16) 87 91 9.98 0.14 87 90 8.94 0.15
European origin
 Yes 1623 (91) 312 (19) 88 91 9.71 0.13 87 90 8.81 0.15
 No 158 (9) 43 (27) 91 81 4.74 0.11 83 86 5.99 0.19
Educational level
 < Higher 1063 (60) 227 (21) 88 87 7.15 0.14 87 88 7.31 0.15
 ≥ Higher 709 (40) 128 (18) 89 93 14.38 0.12 86 92 11.06 0.15
Postmenopausal
 Yes 174 (10) 44 (25) 86 88 7.49 0.15 93 91 10.09 0.08
 No 1607 (90) 311 (19) 89 90 9.13 0.12 85 90 8.31 0.16
Contraception
 None 640 (36) 127 (20) 89 89 8.30 0.12 87 90 8.93 0.14
 Combined oral pill 905 (51) 173 (19) 87 91 9.26 0.14 83 90 8.50 0.19
 Others 236 (13) 55 (23) 91 91 9.68 0.10 96 87 7.27 0.04

† Data were missing for the following variables: current smoking (18 patients) and educational level (9 patients).

Significant comparisons are indicated in bold.