Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 15;65(2):244–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03013.x

Table 2a.

Weighted means (WM 0–12 h) for active treatment comparisons

Tio vs. S100 Tio vs. S50 S100 vs. S50
FEV1 −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) 0.05 (−0.001, 0.09) 0.09 (0.04, 0.13)*
MMEF −0.06 (−0.11, −0.01) 0.01 (−0.05, 0.06) 0.07 (0.02, 0.12)*
sGaw§ 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.10 (1.02, 1.19)* 1.14 (1.06, 1.23)*
RV −0.01 (−0.14, 0.12) −0.08 (−0.21, 0.04) −0.08 (−0.20, 0.05)
R5 −0.01 (−0.03, 0.02) −0.03 (−0.05, −0.01)* −0.02 (−0.05, −0.001)*
R15 0.004 (−0.01, 0.02) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.003) −0.02 (−0.03, −0.001)*
R20 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) −0.001 (−0.01, 0.01) −0.01 (−0.02, −0.001)*
R25 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.004) −0.02 (−0.03, −0.003)*
R35 0.02 (0.01, 0.03) 0.004 (−0.01, 0.02) −0.01 (−0.02, −0.001)*
RF −0.79 (−1.99, 0.41) −1.64 (−2.83, −0.45)* −0.85 (−2.04, 0.34)
X5 −0.01 (−0.04, 0.03) 0.01 (−0.02, 0.04) 0.01 (−0.02, 0.05)

Tio, Tiotropium bromide 18 µg; S100, salmeterol 100 µg; S50, salmeterol 50 µg. Data are

mean difference (95% confidence intervals) or

§

geometric mean (95% confidence intervals).

*

Superiority of Tio over S100, Tio over S50 or S100 over S50.

Superiority of S100 over T. Data for TLC, FRC and IC are not shown as no significant differences seen.

FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; MMEF, maximum mid-expiratory flow; sGaw, specific airway conductance; RV, residual volume; R, resistance; X, reactance.