Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 27;65(2):210–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02993.x

Table 2.

Classification and assessment of ADRS. Classification was done according to Wills & Brown [7] and causalty assessment was done according to Naranjo et al.[6]. Outcomes were assessed according to Hartwig et al. [8]. The treatment details were assessed based on the number of patients (n = 121) where as for all other assessments, the n = 164 (total number of ADRs)

Parameter Number (%) (n = 164)
Type of reaction#
    Type A Augmented reactions 61 (37.2%)
    Type B Bugs reactions
    Type C Chemical reactions
    Type D Delivery reactions 3 (1.8%)
    Type E Exit reactions
    Type F Familial reaction
    Type G Genotoxicity reactions
    Type H Hypersensitivity reactions 100 (61%)
    Type U Unclassified reactions
Causality*
    Definite 10 (6.1%)
    Probable 102 (62.2%)
    Possible 52 (31.7%)
Onset of ADRs
    Acute (<1 h) 7 (4.3%)
    Sub-acute (1–24 h) 91 (55.5%)
    Latent (>2 days) 62 (37.8%)
    Unknown 4 (2.4%)
Severity 88 (53.7%)
    Mild 88 (53.7%)
    Moderate 58 (35.4%)
    Severe 18 (10.9%)
Outcomes
    Fatal 0
    Fully Recovered 119 (72.6%)
    Recovering 36 (%)
    Unknown 9 (%)
Treatment (n = 121)
    Stopped the medication 37 (30.6%)
    Reduced the dose 9 (7.4%)
    Added another drug 16 (13.2%)
    Substituted another drug 27 (22.3%)
    No change 32 (26.4%)
#

Classification according to Wills & Brown [7]

*

classification according to Naranjo et al. [6]

classification according to Hartwig et al. [8].