Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 13;46(4):1241–1245. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01403-07

TABLE 5.

Comparison of results obtained with different test systems for quantitation of CMV DNA

Sample no. No. of CMV DNA copies/ml obtained with:
EZ1/artusa EZ1/R-geneb MPC/artusc MPC/R-gened
1 TNDe TND TND <150f
2 TND TND TND <150
3 TND TND TND <150
4 TND TND TND 200
5 TND TND TND <150
6 TND TND <139f <150
7 TND TND TND 460
8 TND 260 TND 765
9 TND 950 TND <150
10 TND TND <139 <150
11 TND TND TND 400
12 TND TND TND 200
13 TND TND <139 2,300
14 TND TND TND <150
15 TND TND 330 300
16 TND TND TND 740
17 TND 3,180 TND 600
18 TND TND TND 300
19 TND 2,200 TND 1,740
20 TND 540 TND <150
a

EZ1/artus, BioRobot EZ1 workstation/artus CMV LC PCR kit.

b

EZ1/R-gene, BioRobot EZ1 workstation/CMV HHV6,7,8 R-gene quantification kit.

c

MPC/artus, MagNa Pure compact instrument/artus CMV LC PCR kit.

d

MPC/R-gene, MagNa Pure compact instrument/CMV HHV6,7,8 R-gene quantification kit.

e

TND, target not detected.

f

The result is under the lower limit of quantification, i.e., weakly positive.