Abstract
The relative value of routine anaerobic blood culture for recovery of organisms and identification of episodes of bloodstream infection was assessed in a three-component, high-volume blood culture system which employs aerobic and anaerobic bottles of BacT/Alert (Organon-Teknika, Durham, N.C.) and aerobic cultures of Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.). The results of 5,595 blood culture sets from patients with suspected bloodstream infection were analyzed. Compared with either the aerobic BacT/Alert bottle or aerobic culture of Isolator, the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered significantly fewer isolates (242 versus 294, P < 0.05; 242 versus 298, P < 0.05) but did not detect significantly fewer episodes of bloodstream infection (141 versus 157, P > 0.05; 141 versus 147, P > 0.05). The BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered significantly more isolates of obligately anaerobic bacteria (16 versus 4, P < 0.05; 16 versus 0, P < 0.05) and detected significantly more episodes of bloodstream infection caused by obligately anaerobic bacteria (10 versus 3, P < 0.05; 10 versus 0, P < 0.05) than either the aerobic bottle of BacT/Alert or the aerobic culture of Isolator. The combination of the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle and the aerobic culture of Isolator recovered as may isolates (374 versus 377) and detected as many episodes of bloodstream infection (194 versus 191) as the combination of the aerobic bottle of BacT/Alert and the aerobic culture of Isolator, and both of these combinations identified at least 8% more isolates and detected at least 3% more bloodstream infections than the combination of the BacT/Alert aerobic and anaerobic bottles. Further analysis of the data revealed that the utility of the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle, especially when combined with the aerobic culture of Isolator, resulted from not only enhanced recovery of obligately anaerobic bacteria but also effective recovery of facultatively anaerobic bacteria. These results demonstrate the utility of the anaerobic BacT/Alert bottle for detecting bloodstream infection caused by either facultatively anaerobic bacteria or obligately anaerobic bacteria and support the routine inclusion of anaerobic blood culture in the three-component blood culture system used in our hospital.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- COCHRAN W. G. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika. 1950 Dec;37(3-4):256–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dorsher C. W., Rosenblatt J. E., Wilson W. R., Ilstrup D. M. Anaerobic bacteremia: decreasing rate over a 15-year period. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jul-Aug;13(4):633–636. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiehn T. E. Bacteremia and fungemia in the immunocompromised patient. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):832–837. doi: 10.1007/BF02185856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lombardi D. P., Engleberg N. C. Anaerobic bacteremia: incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance. Am J Med. 1992 Jan;92(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mermel L. A., Maki D. G. Detection of bacteremia in adults: consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Aug 15;119(4):270–272. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-4-199308150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C., Fracaro M., Bopp H., O'Keefe M., O'Connor J. Bacteraemia--a New York perception. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Apr;25 (Suppl 100):107–113. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.suppl_c.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas A. G., Jr, LeMelle S. M. The Norplant System: where are we in 1995? J Fam Pract. 1995 Feb;40(2):125–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson W. R., Martin W. J., Wilkowske C. J., Washington J. A., 2nd Anaerobic bacteremia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1972 Sep;47(9):639–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]