Abstract
We compared the results of the Alamar broth microdilution susceptibility testing method with the results of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth microdilution method for 119 gram-positive organisms. The strains were tested for their susceptibilities to 20 antimicrobial agents. Only appropriate antimicrobial agents were evaluated for each species of bacteria. Absolute categorical agreement between the reference method and the test method was 91.5% for enterococci, 99.8% for oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci, and 97.4% for oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. Essential agreement (percent complete agreement plus percent minor errors) was > 99% for all organisms tested. The results for enterococci showed no very major errors, one major error with ofloxacin, and numerous minor errors with the quinolones. However, all except one of the minor errors were within +/- 1 log2 dilution of the reference result. For staphylococci, only 2 very major errors (one each with chloramphenicol and oxacillin), 1 major error (chloramphenicol), and 15 minor errors (multiple drugs) were observed. The Alamar colorimetric system was easy to use and the results were easy to read. It appears to be an acceptable method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococci and enterococci.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (178.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Archer G. L., Climo M. W. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Oct;38(10):2231–2237. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.10.2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker C. N., Banerjee S. N., Tenover F. C. Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric MIC method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1261–1267. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1261-1267.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker C. N., Stocker S. A., Culver D. H., Thornsberry C. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):533–538. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.533-538.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knapp C. C., Ludwig M. D., Washington J. A. Evaluation of differential inoculum disk diffusion method and Vitek GPS-SA card for detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):433–436. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.433-436.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackenzie A. M., Richardson H., Lannigan R., Wood D. Evidence that the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards disk test is less sensitive than the screen plate for detection of low-expression-class methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1909–1911. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1909-1911.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Niles A. C., Heeren R. L. Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2372–2377. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2372-2377.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1992–1996. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1992-1996.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Vu Q., Lancaster M., Espinel-Ingroff A., Fothergill A., Grant C., McGinnis M. R., Pasarell L., Rinaldi M. G., Steele-Moore L. Multisite reproducibility of colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1625–1628. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1625-1628.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swenson J. M., Clark N. C., Ferraro M. J., Sahm D. F., Doern G., Pfaller M. A., Reller L. B., Weinstein M. P., Zabransky R. J., Tenover F. C. Development of a standardized screening method for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1700–1704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1700-1704.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenover F. C., Swenson J. M., O'Hara C. M., Stocker S. A. Ability of commercial and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1524–1527. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1524-1527.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenover F. C., Tokars J., Swenson J., Paul S., Spitalny K., Jarvis W. Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1695–1699. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1695-1699.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willey B. M., Kreiswirth B. N., Simor A. E., Willaims G., Scriver S. R., Phillips A., Low D. E. Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1621–1624. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1621-1624.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zabransky R. J., Dinuzzo A. R., Woods G. L. Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the Alamar MIC system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):791–793. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.791-793.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]