Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(5):791–800. doi: 10.1089/152091503322526996

Table 3.

GW2B Accuracy Summary Statistics by Various Factors

# Paired Data Points Relative Absolute Difference (median) ISO criteria met* (percentage) P-values
Overall 3,672 16% 60%
Subject Age (years) 0.97/0.91
 1 – <7 896 17% 59%
 7 – <12 1,178 15% 61%
 12 – <18 1,598 16% 60%
Gender 0.99/0.70
 Female 1,815 16% 60%
 Male 1,857 16% 61%
Body Mass Index 0.21/0.27
 ≤50th percentile 853 15% 64%
 >50th percentile 2,819 16% 59%
Time of Day 0.56/0.49
 Daytime (6:30AM – 10:30PM) 1,123 15% 63%
 Nighttime (11:00PM – 6:00AM) 1,530 16% 61%
Sensor Age (hours) 0.002/0.006
 0 – <6 1,316 15% 63%
 6 – <10 1,142 15% 64%
 ≥ 10 1,214 19% 54%
GW2B Location|| 0.26/0.22 §
 Lower Arm 2,226 16% 59%
  Inner 1,417 15% 61%
  Outer 809 18% 56%
 Upper Arm 1,284 15% 63%
  Inner 268 17% 58%
  Outer 1,016 15% 65%
Serum Glucose Level (mg/dL) <0.001/< 0.001
 ≤70 334 38% 32%
 71–120 926 18% 55%
 121–180 963 14% 66%
 181–240 776 14% 66%
 >240 673 13% 67%
Hypoglycemia Test 482 20% 52% 0.007/0.02
Hyperglycemia Test 417 15% 66%
*

ISO criteria: for reference glucose value ≤75 mg/dL, GW2B value within ±15 mg/dL and for reference glucose value >75 mg/dL. GW2B value within ±20%.

The first P-value is for RAD and the second P-value is for ISO criteria met.

Includes only hourly and half hour reference glucose values.

§

Comparing lower arm vs. upper arm.

||

162 pairs from sensor pads placed on leg not included.