Skip to main content
. 2007 May 8;22(8):1184–1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0210-8

Table 3.

Relationship of Racial Concordance of Provider to Measures of Disrespect/Mistreatment

  Looked down on/ Treated with disrespect (%) Treated unfairly because of race (%) Treated unfairly because of language (%) Would have received better care if different race (%)
Whites (n = 2,850) (n = 2,708) (n = 2,708) (n = 2,851)
Concordance 1.04 (0.63,1.73) 0.07 (0.02, 0.21)* 0.31 (0.07, 1.38) 0.27 (0.10, 0.74)†
No concordance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Blacks (n = 771) (n = 731) (n = 731) (n = 771)
Concordance 1.33 (0.64, 2.74) 1.05 (0.31, 3.51) 1.57 (0.27,9.17) 1.10 (0.57, 2.11)
No concordance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hispanics (n = 710) (n = 651) (n = 651) (n = 710)
Concordance 2.42 (1.24, 4.73)† 2.39 (0.84, 6.81) 0.71 (0.16,3.15) 1.62 (0.75, 3.51)
No concordance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asians (n = 430) (n = 385) (n = 385) (n = 430)
Concordance 1.01 (0.45, 2.30) 0.01 (0.001, 0.19)* 0.33 (0.07, 1.49) 0.44 (0.17, 1.17)
No concordance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Odds ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals from Multivariate Regression

This table reports percentages derived from our multivariate regression. The dependent variables of interest are: “looked down on/treated with disrespect,” “treated unfairly because of race,” and “would have received better care if different race.” The model controls for income, insurance, usual source of care, age, gender and education; for Hispanics and Asians, language was added as an additional control variable.

*P < 0.001

P < 0.01

P < 0.05