Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 4;466(5):1217–1224. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0134-6

Table 4.

Comparison of absorbable pin fixation and metal radial head (historical controls)

Parameter Absorbable pin fixation (n = 12) Metal radial heads (n = 9) p Value
Gender 1.000
    Males 7 (58.3%) 5 (55.6%)
    Females 5 (41.7%) 4 (44.4%)
Mason type 0.331
    III 10 (83.3%) 5 (55.6%)
    IV 2 (16.7%) 4 (44.4%)
Age (years)* 41.75 (27.91–55.59) 56.11 (49.37–62.85) 0.056§
Followup (months)* 82.33 (64.01–100.65) 38.78 (32.36–45.19) < 0.001§
Flexion (degrees)* 133.58 (127.63–139.53) 140.00 (131.16–148.84) 0.175§
Loss of extension (degrees) 5.00 (0–13.75) 8.00 (2.00–15.50) 0.312Inline graphic
Pronation (degrees) 80.00 (72.50–88.75) 84.00 (73.00–87.50) 0.829Inline graphic
Supination (degrees)* 78.33 (72.23–84.44) 71.67 (64.23–79.10) 0.135§
Mayo score (points) 100 (88.75–100) 83.00 (64.50–85.00) 0.001Inline graphic

*Values expressed as means, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses; values expressed as medians, with interquartile ranges in parentheses;Fisher’s exact test; §Student’s t-test; Inline graphicMann-Whitney U test.