Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Polit Econ. 2007;115:103–140. doi: 10.1086/512249

Table 6.

Instrumental Variable Estimates of Intensive Management and Spending on Survival, by Surgical Intensity of Hospital Referral Region

IV Estimates of

Impact of CATH: Impact of $1000:
Sample: on 1-Year Survival on 1-year Cost ($1000s) on 1-year Survival
1. All patients
HRR risk-adjusted CATH rate:
a. Above the Median (n=63,771) 0.256 (0.061) 6.691 (3.510) 0.038 (0.021)
b. Below the Median (n=66,124) 0.09 (0.059) 9.835 (3.155) 0.009 (0.007)
  Difference: 0.166 (0.085) −3.144 (4.720) 0.029 (0.022)
2. Patients above the median CATH propensity
HRR risk-adjusted CATH rate:
a. Above the Median (n=32,388) 0.271 (0.064) 0.347 (4.370) 0.78 (9.820)
b. Below the Median (n=32,411) 0.168 (0.046) 4.962 (2.890) 0.034 (0.021)
3. Patients below the median CATH propensity
HRR risk-adjusted CATH rate:
a. Above the Median (n=31,383) 0.206 (0.129) 16.21 (5.130) 0.013 (0.009)
b. Below the Median (n=33,713) −0.139 (0.165) 22.064 (6.870) −0.006 (0.007)

Notes: HRR intensity rates are computed as the risk-adjusted fixed effects from a patient level regression the receipt of CATH or beta-blockers on HRR fixed effects and CCP risk-adjusters. Differential-distance (measured as the distance between the patient’s zip-code of residence and the nearest catheterization hospital minus the distance to the nearest hospital) is the instrument. Each model includes all the CCP risk-adjusters and the standard errors are clustered at the level of each HRR.