Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Polit Econ. 2007;115:103–140. doi: 10.1086/512249

Table 7.

Relationship Between HRR Catheterization Rate, Survival and Costs, by Clinical Appropriateness for Intensive Management

OLS Estimates of the Relationship Between HRR Risk-Adjusted CATH Rate and:
Sample: 1-Year Survival 1-year Cost ($1000s) Beta Blocker in Hospital Catheterization within 30 days
1. All patients (n=138,873) 0.007 (0.019) 8.093 (1.410) −0.28 (0.073) 0.702 (0.004)
2. By CATH propensity
a. Top Tercile (n=46,287) 0.052 (0.019) 10.012 (1.439) −0.366 (0.073) 0.802 (0.032)
b. Middle Tercile (n=46,295) 0.03 (0.030) 11.154 (1.784) −0.271 (0.082) 0.906 (0.021)
c. Bottom Tercile (n=46,291) −0.075 (0.028) 2.763 (1.612) −0.209 (0.073) 0.369 (0.021)
Difference (Top-Bottom): 0.127 (0.034) 7.249 (2.161) −0.157 (0.103) 0.433 (0.038)
3. By age
a. 65–80 (n=96,093) 0.023 (0.021) 9.616 (1.448) −0.311 (0.072) 0.775 (0.012)
b. Over 80 (n=42,780) −0.031 (0.028) 4.738 (1.603) −0.215 (0.080) 0.531 (0.022)
Difference (Top-Bottom): 0.054 (0.035) 4.878 (2.160) −0.096 (0.108) 0.244 (0.025)
4. By AHA/ACC criterion
a. Ideal (n=89,569) 0.027 (0.023) 9.845 (1.599) −0.302 (0.076) 0.769 (0.010)
b. Appropriate (n=31,800) −0.002 (0.024) 6.174 (1.537) −0.282 (0.080) 0.752 (0.026)
c. Not appropriate (n=17,504) −0.08 (0.040) 2.958 (1.511) −0.177 (0.065) 0.264 (0.021)
Difference (Top-Bottom): 0.107 (0.046) 6.887 (2.200) −0.125 (0.100) 0.505 (0.023)

Notes: CATH propensity is an empirical measure of patient appropriateness for intensive treatments. We define this measure by using fitted values from a logit model of the receipt of cardiac catheterization on all the CCP risk-adjusters. HRR surgical and medical intensity rates are computed as the risk-adjusted fixed effects from a patient level regression the receipt of CATH or beta-blockers on HRR fixed effects and CCP risk-adjusters.