Skip to main content
. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8918–8921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8918

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Relative place field size (mean ± SE) in the second environment, for 43 place cells that had a place cells in the first environment. The place field size again increased asymptotically by 124% in 17 laps (P < 0.0001) and (B) the place field location (mean ± SE) again shifted backwards by 2.5 cm (P < 0.001), thus indicating that the effect is environment specific and could not be attributed to general excitability changes.