Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 7;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-32

Table 3.

Improved OA Pain Intensity and Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Disease Activity (ITT Population)

Lumiracoxib 100 mg o.d. (n = 755) Lumiracoxib 100 mg b.i.d. (n = 1,519) Celecoxib 200 mg o.d. (n = 758)
Patient's target joint pain intensity assessment
 Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)
  Improvement 382 (50.6) 795 (52.3) 406 (53.6)
  No change 269 (35.6) 566 (37.3) 265 (35.0)
  Worsened 104 (13.8) 158 (10.4) 87 (11.5)
 Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean 2.78 2.72 2.77
Patient's global assessment of disease activity
 Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)
  Improvement 368 (48.7) 768 (50.6) 373 (49.2)
  No change 265 (35.1) 534 (35.2) 269 (35.5)
  Worsened 122 (16.2) 216 (14.2) 116 (15.3)
 Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean 2.61 2.54 2.60
Physician's global assessment of disease activity
 Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)
  Improvement 411 (54.5) 888 (58.5) 425 (56.2)
  No change 244 (32.4) 463 (30.5) 232 (30.7)
  Worsened 99 (13.1) 167 (11.0) 99 (13.1)
 Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean 2.55 2.45* 2.52

o.d. = once daily; b.i.d. = twice daily; ITT = intention-to-treat; patients with missing baseline values were not included; Overall measure of efficacy defined as the weighted average of post-baseline scores using the last observation carried forward technique for missing values and time since previous visit as weight (lower scores represent better responses); *p < 0.05 vs lumiracoxib 100 mg o.d. and celecoxib 200 mg o.d.