Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Nov 27;19(3):305–315. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9093-6

Table 1.

Distribution of cases and controls by stratification variable and socioeconomic category (LM: lymphoid malignancy; NHL: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; HL: Hodgkin’s lymphoma; LPS: lymphoproliferative syndrome; MM: multiple myeloma) – ORs were estimated by unconditional logistic regression adjusted for stratification variables.

All LM
NHL
HL
LPS
MM
Cases n=813 Controls n=748 Co/Ca p Cases n=395 Controls n=698 Co/Ca P Cases n=147 Controls n=415 Co/Ca p Cases n=168 Controls n=464 Co/Ca p Cases n=103 Controls n=476 Co/Ca p
Gender ns ns ns ns **
Female 41% 39% 0.9 39% 38% 1.7 42% 36% 2.4 38% 34% 2.5 50% 35% 3.2
Male 59% 61% 0.9 61% 62% 1.8 58% 64% 3.1 62% 66% 2.9 50% 65% 6.0
Center ns * ns *** ns
Brest 19% 19% 0.9 22% 20% 1.6 15% 18% 3.3 13% 24% 5.0 20% 23% 5.1
Caen 14% 14% 0.9 6% 12% 3.4 11% 12% 3.2 38% 19% 1.4 10% 11% 5.4
Nantes 19% 18% 0.9 19% 17% 1.5 27% 26% 2.7 16% 15% 2.7 12% 12% 4.8
Lille 10% 10% 1.0 8% 9% 2.2 3% 2% 1.6 18% 14% 2.0 14% 11% 3.6
Toulouse 17% 18% 1.0 19% 19% 1.8 22% 21% 2.8 5% 12% 6.0 19% 19% 4.6
Bordeaux 21% 21% 0.9 26% 23% 1.5 22% 21% 2.8 10% 16% 4.7 25% 24% 4.5
Age ns ns *** ns ns
< 30 y 9% 10% 1.0 5% 7% 2.6 37% 17% 1.3 - - - - - -
30–39 y 9% 10% 0.9 10% 10% 1.8 21% 15% 2.0 3% 4% 3.8 3% 3% 4.3
40–49 y 17% 17% 0.9 18% 17% 1.7 22% 22% 2.8 13% 14% 2.9 10% 12% 5.5
50–59 y 29% 29% 0.9 34% 30% 1.6 10% 27% 8.0 34% 32% 2.6 32% 39% 5.6
60–69 y 26% 25% 0.9 23% 25% 2.0 10% 18% 5.0 36% 36% 2.8 43% 34% 3.7
≥ 70y 10% 10% 1.0 11% 10% 1.6 1% 1% 6.0 14% 14% 2.9 13% 12% 4.5
Cases Controls OR [95%CI] Cases Controls OR [95%CI] Cases Controls OR [95%CI] Cases Controls OR [95%CI] Cases Controls OR [95%CI]

Socioeconomic category ** ns * ns ns
Scientific/administrative manager 23% 20% 1.1 [0.8–1.5] 22% 20% 1.1 [0.7–1.6] 25% 19% 1.4 [0.8–2.4] 23% 21% 1.1 [0.7–1.9] 23% 21% 1.2 [0.6–2.4]
Administrative, sales, service worker 26% 25% 1.0 ref. 25% 24% 1.0 ref. 30% 24% 1.0 ref. 27% 24% 1.0 ref. 24% 23% 1.0 Ref.
Factory worker 37% 44% 0.8 [0.6–1.0] 39% 45% 0.9 [0.6–1.2] 26% 45% 0.5 [0.3–0.9] 40% 45% 0.8 [0.5–1.2] 36% 45% 0.9 [0.5–1.6]
Agricultural worker 10% 6% 1.5 [1.0–2.2] 11% 7% 1.6 [1.0–2.7] 5% 6% 1.0 [0.4–2.6] 9% 8% 1.2 [0.6–1.4] 14% 8% 2.2 [1.0–5.0]
Unemployed 4% 5% 3% 4% 14% 6% 1% 2% 3% 3%
Education # ns # ns ns
Less than secondary level 65% 68% 1.0 Ref. 67% 69% 1.0 ref. 44% 62% 1.0 ref. 75% 75% 1.0 ref. 70% 73% 1.0 ref.
Secondary level 35% 32% 1.2 [1.0–1.5] 33% 31% 1.1 [0.8–1.4] 56% 38% 1.5 [1.0–2.3] 25% 25% 1.2 [0.8–1.9] 30% 27% 1.2 [0.7–2.0]
#

p<0.10;

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001; ns: p>0.10