Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2007 Dec 23;377(1):162–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.029

Table 1.

Statistics of the experimental constraints and the results of structure calculation for UQ1-UBA domain and its complex with monoUb

UQ1-UBA UQ1-UBA/Ub complex
Constraints
 distance restraints 1014 ambiguous intermolecular 19 active
restraints from CSP mapping 16 passive
 dihedral angle restraints 66 unambiguous distance restraints (from NOEs and PREs) 14
 hydrogen bonds 40 RDC restraints (secondary structure) 52
 RDC restraints 48
RMSDa (Å)
 backbone, secondary struct. 0.28 ± 0.07 at the interface 0.45 ± 0.15
 heavy atoms, secondary struct. 0.76 ± 0.07 UBA+Ub backbone all residues 0.72 ± 0.35
 backbone, all residues 2.19 ± 1.07 UBA backbone all residues 0.90 ± 0.35
secondary structure residues 0.32 ± 0.07
 heavy atoms, all residues 2.36 ± 0.91 Ub backbone all residues 0.59 ± 0.28
secondary structure residues 0.46 ± 0.13
PROCHECKa
 most favored regions 82.3 ± 2.81% most favored regions 89.1 ± 1.8%
 allowed regions 13.2 ± 3.84% allowed regions 8.7 ± 1.6%
 generously allowed regions 1.82 ± 2.34% generously allowed regions 0.8 ± 0.5%
 disallowed regions 2.72 ± 1.77% disallowed regions 1.3 ± 0.5%
 G-factor overall −0.051 ± 0.039 G-factor overall 0.29 ± 0.02
a

The RMSD and PROCHECK 69 analyses were performed for the ensemble of ten final lowest-energy structures.