TABLE 2.
QTLpra | QTLnh | DGH | QTLdh | QTLph | QTLyi | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marker no.b | 23c | 37 | 63 | 52 | 31 | 24 |
Bin no.d | 22 | 27 | 43 | 39 | 28 | 23 |
QTLpr | — | 12.12e | 9.42 | 0.28 | 7.27 | 0.18 |
QTLnh | — | — | 10.93 | 1.11 | 0.13 | 0.40 |
DGH | — | — | — | 0.78 | 7.02 | 3.25 |
QTLdh | — | — | — | — | 6.28 | 14.62 |
QTLph | — | — | — | — | — | 20.31 |
Mapping data were obtained from this study (QTLpr and QTLnh), from Marcel et al. (2007) (QTLpr and DGH), and from the GrainGenes 2.0 databank (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/) (QTLdh, QTLph, and QTLyi).
The number of (peak) markers mapped on the consensus map of barley (Marcel et al. 2007).
The chi-square values for which the null hypothesis of independent distribution is rejected with a probability P < 0.05 (with 1 d.f., P = 0.05 for χ2 = 3.841) are in italics.
The number of barley bins (5 cM) occupied by the (peak) markers for the respective class.
The chi-square values for which the null hypothesis of independent distribution is rejected with a probability P < 0.01 (with 1 d.f., P = 0.01 for χ2 = 6.634) are underlined.