Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;12(6):1169–1176. doi: 10.1110/ps.0304303

Table 1.

Thermodynamic propensity of different amino acid residues at the helical positions

Amino acid residue ΔΔG(X32) ΔΔG(X28) ΔΔG(X28/V5A) ΔΔG(P&S) ΔΔG(PHD)/Pg(C2)
A 0.0 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.5 0.0/1.46
F −2.4 ± 0.4 −2.3 ± 0.5 −1.7/0.74
G −4.3 ± 0.4 −4.4 ± 0.3 −4.2 ± 0.1 −4.2 ± 0.5 −4.1/0.28
I −0.9 ± 0.2 −1.0 ± 0.2 −1.0 ± 0.2 −1.7 ± 0.5 −0.7/1.12
L −0.6 ± 0.2 −0.9 ± 0.2 −0.3/1.31
M −0.4 ± 0.1 −1.0 ± 0.3 −0.4/1.24
N −2.8 ± 0.3 −2.7 ± 0.4 −2.2/0.60
Q 0.1 ± 0.1 (−0.4 ± 0.1)a −1.6 ± 0.4 −0.3/1.29
S −2.0 ± 0.1 −2.7 ± 0.3 −2.3 ± 0.1 −2.1 ± 0.3 −1.8/0.71
T −2.5 ± 0.1 −2.8 ± 0.4 −1.9/0.69
V −1.7 ± 0.4 −2.0 ± 0.1 −1.7 ± 01 −2.6 ± 0.5 −1.2/0.89

All ΔΔG values are relative to alanine and are in kilojoules per mole. ΔΔG(PHD) = −R • T • ln[Pg(X)/Pg(A)], where the normalized frequency for individual amino acid residues in position C2 of α-helices, Pg, was calculated from the data reported in Penel et al. (1999a,b); ΔΔG(P&S) values of helical propensity for the middle of α-helix are taken from Pace and Scholtz (1998).

a Changes in ΔΔG relative to A32 in the background of A28 variant.