Table 1.
Amino acid residue | ΔΔG(X32) | ΔΔG(X28) | ΔΔG(X28/V5A) | ΔΔG(P&S) | ΔΔG(PHD)/Pg(C2) |
A | 0.0 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.5 | 0.0/1.46 |
F | −2.4 ± 0.4 | — | — | −2.3 ± 0.5 | −1.7/0.74 |
G | −4.3 ± 0.4 | −4.4 ± 0.3 | −4.2 ± 0.1 | −4.2 ± 0.5 | −4.1/0.28 |
I | −0.9 ± 0.2 | −1.0 ± 0.2 | −1.0 ± 0.2 | −1.7 ± 0.5 | −0.7/1.12 |
L | −0.6 ± 0.2 | — | — | −0.9 ± 0.2 | −0.3/1.31 |
M | −0.4 ± 0.1 | — | — | −1.0 ± 0.3 | −0.4/1.24 |
N | −2.8 ± 0.3 | — | — | −2.7 ± 0.4 | −2.2/0.60 |
Q | 0.1 ± 0.1 (−0.4 ± 0.1)a | — | — | −1.6 ± 0.4 | −0.3/1.29 |
S | −2.0 ± 0.1 | −2.7 ± 0.3 | −2.3 ± 0.1 | −2.1 ± 0.3 | −1.8/0.71 |
T | −2.5 ± 0.1 | — | — | −2.8 ± 0.4 | −1.9/0.69 |
V | −1.7 ± 0.4 | −2.0 ± 0.1 | −1.7 ± 01 | −2.6 ± 0.5 | −1.2/0.89 |
All ΔΔG values are relative to alanine and are in kilojoules per mole. ΔΔG(PHD) = −R • T • ln[Pg(X)/Pg(A)], where the normalized frequency for individual amino acid residues in position C2 of α-helices, Pg, was calculated from the data reported in Penel et al. (1999a,b); ΔΔG(P&S) values of helical propensity for the middle of α-helix are taken from Pace and Scholtz (1998).
a Changes in ΔΔG relative to A32 in the background of A28 variant.