Table 2.
AUCs for 2-sided test of DE. This table shows AUC values for different combinations of summarization and DE detection methods. The 10 highest AUC values are highlighted in bold. Note that the PPLR method is only applicable to summarization methods that give uncertainty estimates as well as mean expression levels for each probeset. These results were calculated using only the equal spike-ins as true negatives, and all spike-ins with FC > 1 as true positives. A post-summarization loess normalization using the equal-valued spike-ins was used. The results in this table are for 2-sided tests of DE.
limma | FC | t-test | Cyber-T | PPLR | |
mmgMOS | 0.903 | 0.861 | 0.902 | 0.919 | 0.922 |
MAS5 | 0.884 | 0.848 | 0.879 | 0.905 | |
CP | 0.905 | 0.873 | 0.898 | 0.919 | 0.889 |
PLIER | 0.898 | 0.889 | 0.889 | 0.911 | |
RMA | 0.881 | 0.885 | 0.858 | 0.886 | 0.860 |
GCRMA | 0.890 | 0.902 | 0.883 | 0.909 | |
DFW | 0.764 | 0.815 | 0.732 | 0.703 | 0.806 |
MBEI | 0.885 | 0.884 | 0.870 | 0.897 | 0.855 |
FARMS | 0.842 | 0.891 | 0.805 | 0.844 | 0.772 |