Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 27;23(5):654–671. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0521-4

Table 2.

The Use of Invasive Procedures for Stroke Among Veterans by Race

Author, year Conditions Subjects (N) Percent of patients treated per procedure and race group, AA v. white (Hispanic where noted) Adjusted OR (95%CI) for AA (or Hispanic where noted) v. white race as referent Treatment disparities present or absent
Oddone, 19935 Stroke or TIA 27,690 white 6,526 AA 1162 Hisp CA 5.3 v 11, Hisp 8.3 (–) CEA 14.9 v 38.1, Hisp 22.7 (–) CA: 0.47 (0.42–0.53) Hisp 0.78 (0.63–0.98) Present
CEA:0.28 (0.20–0.38) Hisp 0.45 (0.28–0.73)
Oddone, 19996 Stroke or TIA 389 AA 414 white Ultrasound or CA: 67 v 79 (*) Ultrasound or CA: 0.67 (0.47–0.94) Present
CEA: Appropriate for CE 50 v 67 Uncertain appropriateness 3 v 24 CEA: Appropriate 0.75 (0.40–1.43) Uncertain 0.11 (0.01–0.79)
Oddone, 20027 > = 50% stenosis in a carotid artery 91 AA 617 white CA 17 v 20 (ns) CEA 14 v 20 (ns) CEA 1.0 (0.45–2.0) Absent
Goldstein, 20038 Stroke 255 non-white 520 white CA non-white 3.1 v white 8.5 (*) CEA non-white 0.8 v white 1.5 (ns) Absent

(–) p value not reported

(*) statistically significant p value

(ns) p value not significant

AA African American, Hisp Hispanic, CA carotid angiography, CEA carotid endarterectomy, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, TIA transient ischemic attack