Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2007 Sep 24;99(1-3):274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.027

Table 3.

Correlations between symptom ratings and ERP amplitudes


Reality Distortiona Negative Symptomsb SANS Total
Response negativity 100% post-learning .35. .02 .14
80% post-learning .43.. -.03 .03

Feedback negativity 100% pre-learning .16 .42.. .34.
80% invalid pre-learning .15 .42.. .33.
80% invalid post-learning .09 .33. .40..
80% valid post-learning .13 .39. .24
50% post-learning .10 .34. .41..

..

p < .05 (two tailed)

.

p < .1 (two tailed)

a

Sum of BPRS ratings on suspiciousness, hallucinations, unusual thought content, and grandiosity items (range 4-17)

b

Sum of BPRS ratings on blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, and motor retardation items (range 3-20)

BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

SANS: Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms

Note: Positive coefficients indicate that higher/more severe symptom ratings are associated with smaller/less negative ERP amplitude.