Skip to main content
. 2002 Nov 15;546(Pt 1):149–163. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.027896

Table 3.

Effect of H2O2 and other treatments on pCa50 and Hill coefficient in soleus fibres

Treatment ΔpCa50 ΔnH n
(1) Repeeted control sequence −0.002 ± 0.002 −0.1 ± 0.1 28
(2) 5 mm GSH (5 min) at pCa > 9 −0.004 ± 0.001 −0.1 ± 0.1 3
(3) 10 mm H2O2 at pCa > 9 (5 min) −0.011 ± 0.008 −2.1 ± 0.8* 3
(4) 10 mm H2O2 during activation, −0.003 ± 0.008 −1.2 ± 0.2* 10
  subsequent 10 mm DTT (10 min) −0.003 ± 0.007 +0.2 ± 0.2 7
(5) 10 mm H2O2 during activation, +0.012 ± 0.004 −0.9 ± 0.2* 3
  subsequent 5 mm GSH (2 min) −0.010 ± 0.008 +0.1 ± 0.1 3
(6) 100 μm DTDP (5 min) at pCa > 9, −0.059 ± 0.027 −1.1 ± 0.5* 5
  subsequent 5 mm GSH (2 min), +0.001 ± 0.002 −0.1 ± 0.1 5
  subsequent 10 mm DTT (10 min) +0.023 ± 0.011 +0.3 ± 0.2 4
(7) 100 μm DTDP during activation, +0.353 ± 0.081* −1.6 ± 0.3* 5
  subsequent 5 mm GSH (2 min), +0.000 ± 0.002 0.0 ± 0.1 3
  subsequent 10 mm DTT (20 min) −0.351 ± 0.069 +1.9 ± 0.2 3

Mean change (± s.e.m.) in pCa50 and nH resulting from each of the indicated treatments, with n being the number of slow-twitch soleus fibres. Mean (± s.e.m.) values of pCa50 and nH in soleus fibres in the whole study (n = 28) were 6.09 ± 0.02 end 4.3 ± 0.2, respectively.

*

Mean is significantly different from repeated control sequence case (treatment 1; one way ANOVA).

Mean change after subsequent treatment (DTT or GSH) is significantly different from zero (Students two-tailed t test).

For treatment 6 indicates significance at P < 0.05 using Student's one-tailed t test. Fibres for treatment 5 are a subset of those used for the initial part of treatment 4.