Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 4;550(Pt 3):829–844. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042176

Figure 4. Variability in electrical coupling between ICCmy and the circular muscle layer in different preparations.

Figure 4

A, superimposed simultaneous membrane potential traces recorded from an ICCmy and a circular muscle cell (smaller amplitude trace). Note the modest initial component of the slow wave. B, electrotonic potentials recorded from ICCmy (a) and circular muscle (b) in response to current (c) injected into the circular muscle layer: the membrane potentials of the circular smooth muscle layer and ICCmy were −60 and −62 mV, respectively. C, superimposed simultaneous membrane potential traces recorded from a different bundle obtained from the same animal. Note the large initial component of the slow wave. D, electrotonic potentials recorded from ICCmy (a) and circular muscle (b) in response to current (c) injected into the circular muscle layer: the membrane potentials of the circular smooth muscle layer and ICCmy were −63 and −63 mV, respectively. The voltage and current calibration bars apply to all traces. E, relationship between the coupling ratio (see text) and the amplitude of the initial component of the slow wave, together with a straight-line fit.