Skip to main content
. 2003 Aug 1;552(Pt 1):135–148. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.047191

Figure 8. Extracellular Ba2+ does not block Ih.

Figure 8

A, currents elicited by hyperpolarizing voltage steps (1 s duration, from −30 to −130 mV with 10 mV decrements) before and during the bath application of BaCl2 (1 mM). B, plots of Iin (▪) and Iss (□) in the control medium, and Iin (•) and Iss (○) during the application of BaCl2. Note that extracellular Ba2+ caused a marked inward shift of the holding current and a slight decrease in the leak conductance, but no significant change in the amplitude of Ih. C, recordings of the membrane potential and input resistances before, during and after the bath application of BaCl2 (1 mM). The thick line indicates the period of the application of BaCl2. A hyperpolarizing current pulse (160 pA, 100 ms duration) was injected every 10 s to monitor the input resistance changes. Note a marked membrane depolarization with an increase in the input resistance during the effect of extracellular Ba2+. D, enlargements of the voltage responses to the hyperpolarizing current pulses before (a), during (b) and after (c) the bath application of BaCl2.