Skip to main content
. 2003 Aug 22;552(Pt 3):823–832. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049247

Table 2.

Effect of dietary manipulation on mice glycaemia

Diet Wild-type mice mm±s.e.m.(n) GLUT2-null mice mm±s.e.m.(n) Wild/null
LC 5.10 ± 0.72(26)a 4.43 ± 0.83(14)e *
HG 7.04 ± 0.94(25)c 6.60 ± 1.44(32)f n.s.
HF 7.63 ± 1.27 (34)c 5.44 ± 1.10(41)g ***
HF + fructose bolus 11.93 ± 2.38(18)d 8.27 ± 1.60(20)h ***
Standard chow 5.93 ± 0.66 (13)b 6.71 ± 1.05 (6)f n.s.

Mice had free access to the different diets for 5 days. Glucose was measured from tail blood at 9:00 a.m. The levels of glycaemia of fructose-fed mice were measured before (HF) and 30 min after a fructose bolus in the stomach (HF + fructose bolus) and were statistically different P < 0.001 in both GLUT2-null and wild-type mice. Statistical significance

***

p < 0.001 and

*

P < 0.05 comparing wild-type and GLUT2-null mice for each diet. Letters indicate statistically significant differences relative to sugar (HG, HF, HF + fructose bolus and standard chow) in the diet as compared with low carbohydrate supply (LC) in wild-type animals: bP < 0.01, a,c,dP < 0.001; and GLUT2-null mice: e,g,hP < 0.0001, fP < 0.05.