Skip to main content
. 1997 Oct 14;94(21):11301–11306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11301

Table 1.

M2 TM bundle parameters obtained from PI(n), hydrophobicity (Hb) (28), and positional propensity (P) (21) analysis

Parameter C, residues D, residues Pitch angle,* α Pairwise helix crossing angle, ɛ
PI(n) 2.58  ±  0.91 3.46  ±  0.09 −14.5  ±  9.2 19.4
Hb 2.44  ±  0.82 3.45  ±  0.08 −15.5  ±  8.2 20.5
P 2.65  ±  0.95 3.48  ±  0.10 −12.4  ±  10.3 16.8
Average 2.56  ±  0.51 3.46  ±  0.05 −14.1  ±  5.3 18.9
*

α can be predicted from the sequence-defined period (D), the repeat of the α-helix (a), the effective radius of the α-helix (r0), and the helical rise per residue (h) (22, 29) as in Eq. 3 of the text, where r0 = 5.5 Å, h = 1.5 Å, and a = 3.60. The errors reflect the uncertainty in α based on the uncertainty in D and a (30).

Calculated using equation 11 of ref. 22.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure