Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):736–743. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60343-8

Table 3.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value for Retinopathy At Different Fasting Plasma Glucose Cut Offs. To convert from mmol/l to mg/dl, multiply by 18.

Fasting plasma glucose threshold No of retinopathy cases/Total no of participants (%)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive Predictive Value (%) Negative Predictive Value (%) Positive Likelihood Ratio Negative Likelihood Ratio
Below the cut off Above the cut off
The Blue Mountains Eye Study
 ≥ 7.8 mmol/l 314/3030 (10.4) 50/132 (37.9) 37.9 89.6 37.9 89.6 3.6 0.7
 ≥ 7.0 mmol/l 310/2990 (10.4) 54/172 (31.4) 31.4 89.6 31.4 89.6 3.0 0.8
 ≥ 5.6 mmol/l 262/2568 (10.2) 102/594 (17.2) 17.2 89.8 17.2 89.8 1.7 0.9
The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study
 ≥ 7.8 mmol/l 144/1884 (7.6) 66/298 (22.2) 22.2 92.4 22.2 92.4 2.9 0.8
 ≥ 7.0 mmol/l 128/1722 (7.4) 82/460 (17.8) 17.8 92.6 17.8 92.6 2.4 0.9
 ≥ 5.6 mmol/l 57/773 (7.4) 153/7.89 (10.9) 10.9 92.6 10.9 92.6 1.5 1.0
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
 ≥ 7.8 mmol/l 772/5611 (13.8) 187/468 (40.0) 40.0 86.2 40.0 86.2 2.9 0.7
 ≥ 7.0 mmol/l 725/5404 (13.4) 234/675 (34.7) 34.7 86.6 34.7 86.6 2.6 0.8
 ≥ 5.6 mmol/l 450/3524 (12.8) 509/2555 (19.9) 19.9 87.2 19.9 87.2 1.6 0.9