Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186

Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.

L Ostergaard 1, J K Møller 1, B Andersen 1, F Olesen 1
PMCID: PMC2352526  PMID: 8916753

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare urine and vaginal flush samples collected by women at home with endocervical and urethral swabs obtained by general practitioners for their efficacy in the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. DESIGN: Multipractice comparative study. SETTING: 33 general practices and a central department of clinical microbiology in Aarhus County, Denmark. SUBJECTS: 222 women aged 18-25 years who for any reason had a gynaecological examination. INTERVENTIONS: Endocervical and urethral swabs were obtained by the women's general practitioners. The same women when at home then collected a first void urine sample, a midstream urine sample, and a vaginal flush sample (using a vaginal pipette) and mailed them to the laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: C trachomatis defected by the polymerase chain reaction and the ligase chain reaction. Eight tests for C trachomatis were performed for every woman. When two of the eight yielded positive results the patient was considered infected. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of C trachomatis infection was 11.2% (23/205 women). Test sensitivities in samples obtained by general practitioners, samples obtained at home subjected to polymerase chain reaction, and samples obtained at home subjected to ligase chain reaction were 91%, 96%, and 100% respectively. The corresponding specificities were 100%, 92.9%, and 99.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic efficacy of samples obtained by women at home and mailed to the laboratory was as good as for samples obtained by a general practitioner when using the ligase chain reaction. This may have important implications for the practicability of screening for this common, often asymptomatic, and treatable infection.

Full text

PDF
1186

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Addiss D. G., Vaughn M. L., Ludka D., Pfister J., Davis J. P. Decreased prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with a selective screening program in family planning clinics in Wisconsin. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):28–35. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199301000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassiri M., Hu H. Y., Domeika M. A., Burczak J., Svensson L. O., Lee H. H., Mårdh P. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):898–900. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.898-900.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunham R. C., Paavonen J., Stevens C. E., Kiviat N., Kuo C. C., Critchlow C. W., Holmes K. K. Mucopurulent cervicitis--the ignored counterpart in women of urethritis in men. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jul 5;311(1):1–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407053110101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cates W., Jr, Wasserheit J. N. Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 2):1771–1781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90559-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chernesky M. A., Jang D., Lee H., Burczak J. D., Hu H., Sellors J., Tomazic-Allen S. J., Mahony J. B. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2682–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Genç M., Mårdh A. A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 1):1–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_1-199601010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hadgu A. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):592–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay P. E., Thomas B. J., Horner P. J., MacLeod E., Renton A. M., Taylor-Robinson D. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find. Genitourin Med. 1994 Apr;70(2):97–100. doi: 10.1136/sti.70.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hillis S. D., Nakashima A., Marchbanks P. A., Addiss D. G., Davis J. P. Risk factors for recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):801–806. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70286-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jaschek G., Gaydos C. A., Welsh L. E., Quinn T. C. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1209–1212. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1209-1212.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morris R. E., Legault J., Baker C. Prevalence of isolated urethral asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the absence of cervical infection in incarcerated adolescent girls. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Jul-Aug;20(4):198–200. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199307000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ostergaard L., Birkelund S., Christiansen G. Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1254–1260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1254-1260.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ostergaard L., Traulsen J., Birkelund S., Christiansen G. Evaluation of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections by cell culture and the polymerase chain reaction using a closed system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Dec;10(12):1057–1061. doi: 10.1007/BF01984929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schachter J., Moncada J., Whidden R., Shaw H., Bolan G., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women. J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;172(5):1411–1414. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.5.1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scholes D., Stergachis A., Heidrich F. E., Andrilla H., Holmes K. K., Stamm W. E. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1362–1366. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weinstock H. S., Bolan G. A., Kohn R., Balladares C., Back A., Oliva G. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a need for universal screening in high prevalence populations? Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jan 1;135(1):41–47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiesenfeld H. C., Uhrin M., Dixon B. W., Sweet R. L. Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Sep-Oct;21(5):268–271. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199409000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. van Doornum G. J., Buimer M., Prins M., Henquet C. J., Coutinho R. A., Plier P. K., Tomazic-Allen S., Hu H., Lee H. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2042–2047. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2042-2047.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES