Skip to main content
. 2008 May;49(5):463–472.

Table 6.

Summary of morbidity data collected in a study to compare 2 vaccination programs in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing undifferentiated fever (UF)/bovine respiratory disease

Experimental group
Morbidity variable MLV3-BT2a MLV4-BT1b Relative riskc 95% CId P-value
Initial UF treatment 327 (16.84)f 416 (21.44)f 0.78 0.69–0.89 < 0.001
First UF relapse 136 (41.59) 182 (43.75) 0.94 0.80–1.11 0.498
Initial NF treatmente 169 (8.70) 186 (9.59) 0.91 0.74–1.11 0.340
First NF relapsee 66 (39.05) 85 (45.70) 0.86 0.67–1.09 0.206
Overall chronicity 69 (3.55) 113 (5.82) 0.61 0.45–0.81 < 0.001
Overall wastage 32 (1.65) 52 (2.68) 0.61 0.39–0.95 0.027
a

Animals in the MLV3-BT2 group received a modified-live viral vaccine containing infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBRV), type I and II bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and a Mannheimia haemolytica (MH) and Pasteurella multocida (PM) bacterin-toxoid [Express 3 and Pulmo-guard PHM-1; respectively, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Burlington, Ontario]. There were 6 pens and 1942 animals in the MLV3-BT2 group

b

Animals in the MLV4-BT1 group received a modified-live viral vaccine containing IBRV, type I BVDV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza-3 virus and a MH bacterin-toxoid (Bovi-Shield 4 and One Shot; respectively, Pfizer Animal Health, Pfizer Canada, Kirkland, Quebec). There were 6 pens and 1940 animals in the MLV4-BT1 group

c

Relative Risk is the ratio of the rate of disease in the MLV3-BT2 group divided by the rate of the disease in the MLV4-BT1 group

d

95% CI is the 95% confidence interval calculated for each relative risk, corrected for pen and replicate effects using Poisson regression in a log linear model and generalized estimating equations

e

NF — no fever

f

Numbers presented are numbers of animals with percentages in parentheses