Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 5;97(1):6–13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603841

Table 7. Univariate analyses of high comfort levels with SDMa.

  High comfort with SDM N (%) χ2 (d.f.)
Doctor type
 Medical oncologists 105 (89.0) χ2(4)=4.95
 Radiation oncologists 39 (78.0)  
 Haematologistsb 4 (66.7)  
 Paediatric oncologists 9 (81.8)  
 Surgeons 296 (84.3)  
     
Cancer specialty
 Breast and urological 360 (87.6) χ2(1)=12.74**
 Colorectal, gynaecology and haematology 93 (74.4)  
     
Gender
 Male 372 (83.0) χ2(2)=4.56*
 Female 81 (92.0)  
     
Age
 Under 40 years 65 (86.7) χ2(2)=0.42
 40–55 years 241 (83.4)  
 Over 55 years 146 (84.6)  
     
Country of medical training
 Australia 412 (84.4) χ2(1)=0.00
 Other 39 (84.8)  
     
Caseload per month
 2 or less 62 (81.6) χ2(3)=6.65
 3–6 162 (80.6) P=0.084
 7–10 111 (86.7)  
 11+ 113 (90.4)  
     
Direct patient care per week
 <20 hrs 137 (82.5) χ2(1)=0.70
 20+hrs 315 (85.4)  
     
Community size
 <100 000 34 (85.0) χ2(2)=1.27
 100 000–500 000 158 (86.8)  
 500 000+ 259 (83.0)  

*P<0.05 **P<0.01.

a

Percentages here represent respondents who reported comfort levels of 4 or 5 on the 5-point Likert scale, 1=not comfortable, 5=very comfortable.

b

An initial decision to shorten the survey for participants other than breast cancer specialists, excluding the question concerning comfort levels with each of the four decision making examples was reversed mid-way through sending the survey to second cohort (haematologists) and explains the small number of responses in this group for these questions.