Table 4.

Regression Analysis of PTOPS scores on baseline socio-demographic and healthcare variables (n = 131)

Enhancer
Overall Model		r2	F value	P value
		0.040	5.334	0.022
Predictor Variables	Injury Site	Age	First time to attend PT*	No. of PT sessions	Gender	Marital Status	Profession/Degree	GP referral to PT
Beta	0.200	-0.022	-0.102	0.155	-0.047	-0.116	-0.041	0.031
t-value	2.314	-0.243	-1.182	1.784	-0.540	-1.340	-0.467	0.354
significance	0.022	0.808	0.240	0.077	0.590	0.183	0.641	0.724
Detractor
Overall Model		r2	F value	P value
		0.096	13.568	<0.001
Predictor Variables	Injury Site	Age	First time to attend PT*	Number of PT sessions	Gender	Marital Status	Profession/Degree	GP referral to PT
Beta	-0.063	-0.310	0.110	-0.044	0.147	0.131	-0.093	-0.036
t-value	-0.718	-3.683	1.311	-0.517	1.707	1.415	-1.102	-0.425
significance	0.474	<0.001	0.192	0.606	0.090	0.159	0.273	0.671
Location
Overall Model		r2	F value	P value
		0.096	13.568	<0.001
Predictor Variables	Injury Site	Age	First time to attend PT*	Number of PT sessions	Gender	Marital Status	Profession/Degree	GP referral to PT
Beta	0.123	-0.034	-0.079	0.111	0.109	0.053	0.170	-0.057
t-value	1.307	-0.323	-0.872	1.222	1.142	0.537	1.839	-0.622
significance	0.194	0.747	0.385	0.224	0.256	0.592	0.068	0.535
Cost
Overall Model		r2	F value	P value
		0.055	0.872	0.542
Predictor Variables	Injury Site	Age	First time to attend PT*	Number of PT sessions	Gender	Marital Status	Profession/Degree	GP referral to PT
Beta	-0.048	-0.078	0.064	-0.013	0.111	0.129	0.149	-0.059
t-value	-0.502	-0.724	0.687	-0.143	1.140	1.279	1.584	-0.637
significance	0.617	0.470	0.494	0.886	0.256	0.203	0.116	0.525

* PT = Physiotherapy