Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 22;105(17):6362–6367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711774105

Table 1.

The proportions of the total genetic variances in expression differences explained by each of the seven terms (the first column) of Eq. 1

Chromosomal effect Gene location
Genic cis effect, %
X, % (n = 188) II, % (n = 493) III, % (n = 534) All, % (n = 1,215)
X 30.33 (1.79) 21.14 (0.82) 20.56 (0.81) 22.31 (0.57) 9.49 [8.08] {14.4}
II 6.72 (0.87) 12.96 (0.81) 8.04 (0.52) 9.83 (0.43) 5.27 [4.9] {5.41}
III 32.00 (1.63) 32.69 (0.98) 39.55 (1.06) 35.60 (0.67) 7.05 [6.04] {11.2}
    Subtotal 67.74 (0.51) 6.70 [5.95] {8.83}
(X, II) 5.11 (0.59) 5.55 (0.35) 5.32 (0.32) 5.38 (0.22)
(X, III) 17.39 (1.2) 19.36 (0.74) 17.56 (0.65) 18.26 (0.46)
(II, III) 3.17 (0.36) 3.36 (0.23) 3.56 (0.24) 3.42 (0.15)
    Subtotal 27.1 (0.47)
(X, III, III) 5.27 (0.55) 4.94 (0.36) 5.41 (0.40) 5.19 (0.24)

These proportions are averaged across all genes on X, II, and III and all chromosomes as shown in columns 2–4. Standard errors are given in parentheses. The last column gives the proportions of variances explained by the genic cis effect (see Results). The genic cis effects are separately estimated for two groups of genes—non-race-differentiating and race-differentiating genes (see Results). The estimates are shown in brackets and braces for the two groups, respectively

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure