Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 14;94(5):698–709. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602986

Table 2. Correlation between CKMT1expression and classification in oral squamous cell carcinomas.

  Result of immunostaining: no. of patients (%)
  Result of real-time PCR: no. of patients (%)
Clinical classification Total CKMT1 (−) CKMT1 (+) P-value Total CKMT1 (−) CKMT1 (+) P-value
Age at surgery (year)
 ⩽49 12 2(17) 10(83)   6 2(33) 4(67)  
 50–59 16 9(56) 7(44) 0.208971 13 6(46) 7(54) 0.722219
 60–69 12 4(33) 8(67)   13 7(54) 6(46)  
 70 12 4(33) 8(67)   18 6(33) 12(67)  
                 
Gender
 Male 31 13(42) 18(48)   32 13(41) 19(59) 1
 Female 21 6(29) 15(71) 0.388742 18 8(44) 10(56)  
                 
T-primary tumour
 T1 4 0(0) 4(100)   5 2(40) 3(60)  
 T2 26 9(35) 17(65) 0.223836 30 9(30) 21(70) 0.117337
 T3 6 4(67) 2(33)   5 3(60) 2(40)  
 T4 16 6(38) 10(62)   10 7(70) 3(30)  
                 
N-regional lymph node
 N(−) 38 15(39) 23(61) 0.533534 18 5(28) 13(72) 0.1485
 N(+) 14 4(29) 10(71)   32 16(50) 16(50)  
                 
Stage
 I 4 0(0) 4(100)   2 1(50) 1(50)  
 II 15 5(33) 10(67) 0.115748 13 3(23) 10(77) 0.213194
 III 5 4(80) 1(20)   14 4(29) 9(71)  
 IV 28 10(36) 18(64)   21 12(57) 9(43)  
                 
Histopathologic type
 Well differentiated 35 5(14) 30(86)   42 15(36) 27(64)  
 Modelately differentiated 11 8(73) 3(27) <0.0001 7 5(71) 2(29) 0.0633215
 Poorly differentiated 6 6(100) 0(0)   1 1(100) 0(0)  
                 
Tumour site
 Gingiva 16 5(31) 11(69)   17 7(41) 10(59)  
 Tongue 26 10(38) 16(62)   19 6(32) 13(68)  
 Buccal mucosa 4 0(0) 4(100) 0.298623 7 3(43) 4(57) 0.30294
 Oral floor 3 2(67) 1(33)   2 1(50) 1(50)  
 Oropharyngeal isthmus 3 2(67) 1(33)   2 2(100) 0(0)  
 Lower lip   2 2(100) 0(0)  
 Soft palate   1 0(0) 1(100)  
 Leukoplakias 21 0 21