Skip to main content
. 2006 May 30;94(12):1809–1815. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603195

Table 1. Characteristics of patients entered in the phase I and II studies.

Characteristics Phase I, no. (%) Phase II, no. (%)
Total patients 20 (100) 31 (100)
 Males 14 (70) 16 (52)
 Females 6 (30) 15 (48)
Median age (years) (range) 63 (41–77) 56 (29–74)
     
ECOG performance status
 0 9 (45) 12 (39)
 1 11 (55) 17 (55)
 2 0 2 (6)
     
Risk of failurea and TNM clinical staging
 Low risk    
  T1–2/N0 1 (5) 0
     
 Intermediate risk
  T1–2/N1 0 1 (3)
  T3N0 8 3 (10)
     
 Moderately high risk
  T1–2/N2 0 0
  T3N1 7 (35) 14 (45)
  T4N0 3 (15) 0
     
 High risk
  T3N2 0 7 (23)
  T4N1–2 1 (5) 6 (19)
     
Distance of primary tumour from anal verge
 ⩽5 cm 11 (55) 15 (48)
 6–10 cm 8 (40) 12 (39)
 >10 cm 1 (5) 4 (13)
     
Distance of tumour from mesorectal fascia b
 ⩽5 cm 3 (15) 19 (61)
 >5 cm 3 (15) 9 (29)
 Not evaluated 14 (70) 3 (10)
     
CEA
 =5 UI 11 (55) 21 (68)
 >5 UI 9 (45) 10 (32)

CEA=carcinoembryonic antigen assay; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TNM=tumour node metastasis.

a

Risk of failure evaluated according to Gunderson's classification.

b

Evaluated by MRI (only in patient treated with oxaliplatin). In two patients treated in the phase I and in three patients in the phase II studies, MRI was not performed because of metal prosthesis in four and metal stitches in the other.