Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar 8;92(6):1033–1037. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602414

Table 2. Studies included in the present meta-analysis.

Authors Study design Stage No. of limited resection No. of lobectomy Reasons for limited resection Survival difference
Hoffmann and Ransdell (1980) RS IA 33 (W) 40a Poor cardiopulmonary function and smaller lesions NS
Read et al (1990) RS IA 113 (1O7S+6W) 131 ND NS (CSS)
Date et al (1994) MPS IA 16 (6S+10W) 16 Poor pulmonary function Lobectomy better
Warren and Faber (1994) RS IA+B 66 (S) 103 Poor cardiopulmonary function and smaller lesions Lobectomy better
Harpole et al (1995) RS IA+B 75 (W) 193 Poor cardiopulmonary function and smaller lesions NS (CSS)
LCSG (1996) RCT IA 122 (82S+40W) 125 Randomisation NS
Kodama et al (1997) RS IA 46b (W) 77 Intentional resection for small lesions NS
Landreneau et al (1997) RS IA 102 (W) 117 Poor cardiopulmonary function NS
Pastorino et al (1997) RS IA+B 53 (S+W) 367 ND NS
Kwiatkowski et al (1998) RS IA+B 58 (S+W) 186c ND Lobectomy better
Okada et al (2001) RS IA⩽2 cm 70 (S) 139 Intentional resection for small lesions ⩽2 cm NS
Koike et al (2003) RS IA⩽2 cm 74 (60S+14W) 159 Intentional resection for small lesions ⩽2 cm NS
Campione et al (2004) RS IA 21 (S) 100 Poor cardiopulmonary function NS
Keenan et al (2004) RS IA+B 54 (8) 147 Poor pulmonary function NS
a

Tumours peripherally located.

b

Only intentional resection.

c

Including 13 pneumonectomies.

LCSG=Lung Cancer Study Group; S=segmentectomy; W=wedge resection; ND=not described; NS=not significant; MPS=matched-pair study; RCT=randomised controlled trial; RS=retrospective study; CSS=cancer-specific survival.