Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar 8;92(6):1006–1012. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602438

Table 1. Patient summary.

Patient Dose level Gender Age (years) Clinical outcome
1 1 F 51 Excellent response to treatment, had nine cycles
2 1 F 62 PD after C2
3 1 F 57 PD after C4
4 2 M 31 Withdrawn due to brain metastases
5 2 F 41 Improvement in CT after C3, but PD after C5
6 2 M 55 PD after 22 days
7 2 M 37 After C6, MRI revealed cysts and no cancer
8 3 M 55 PD after 31 days
9 3 M 52 PD after C2
10 4 F 50 Minor response after C3. Withdrawn due to G4 thrombocytopenia after C4
11 4 F 52 Stopped after C2 due to haematoxocity and allergic reaction to taxol
12 4 F 66 PD after C3
201 4 M 65 PD after C2
13 4 F 38 Withdrawn due to brain metastases after C3
14 4 M 29 Not given treatment, bleeding lesion
202 4 M 53 PD after C2
203 5 M 68 Withdrawn due to brain metastases after C1
204 5 M 63 SD after C2 and C4, but withdrawn due to brain metastases after C4
205 5 M 54 Withdrawn due to brain metastases after C1
206 6 F 52 PR after C3, had six cycles in total
20 6 M 41 PD after C2
21 6 M 69 PD after C2

Patients were recruited at two centres, with different patient number schemes at each center.

PD=progressive disease; C2=course 2, etc.; CT=computerised tomography scan; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging scan; G4=Grade 4, etc., M=male; F=female; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.