Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 19;31(1):376–385. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.035

Table 2.

Clusters of significant CBF changes during the 2-back task compared to the resting baselinea

Type Size (voxels) Anatomical label BA Talairach coordinates
Z score Δ CBF ± SD (ml/100 g/min) % CBF change ± SD
x y z
Activation 194 L. inferior parietal lobule 40 -50 -33 40 3.70 8.3 ± 6.1 15.7 (±13.0)
L. inferior parietal lobule 40 -33 -50 41 3.00
186 L. inferior frontal gyrus 9 -50 4 30 3.84 7.7 ± 5.0 14.1 (±11.6)
L. precentral gyrus 6 -39 22 27 2.84
141 L. medial frontal gyrus 6 -6 17 43 3.86 7.3 ± 4.2 11.5 (±6.6)
R. cingulate gyrus 32 9 14 38 3.60
L. medial frontal gyrus 6 -3 3 55 3.28
120 L. middle occipital gyrus 37 -48 -64 -7 3.27 11.1 ± 13.8b 26.0 (±39.3)b
Deactivation 432 L. medial frontal gyrus 6 -6 -20 56 4.07 -5.6 ± 2.6 -12.1 (±6.3)
R. cingulate gyrus 24 12 -13 39 3.94
R. paracentral lobule 6 9 -24 51 3.74
399 R. insular 13 36 -5 20 3.65 -5.6 ± 2.7 -11.5 (±6.1)
R. insular 13 39 -22 29 3.54
R. superior temporal gyrus 22 62 3 -5 3.25
392 L. superior temporal gyrus 22 -53 -12 1 3.91 -6.9 ± 3.4 -10.2 (±3.9)
L. insular 13 -45 -20 15 3.63
L. middle temporal gyrus 21 -50 -1 -18 3.37
61 R. superior frontal gyrus 10 15 62 22 3.45 -6.5 ± 4.2 -13.5 (±10.3)
a

The details of this table are the same as those for Table 1.

b

Based on n = 11. One subject’s resting CBF value for this region showed extreme value due to artifacts and was excluded.