Table 2.
[35S]GTP-γ-S binding |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hDORa [3H]DPDPEb |
rMORa [3H]DAMGOc |
hDORd |
rMORd |
IC50,e nM |
||||||||
log IC50f,g | Ki,h nM | log IC50f,g | Ki,h nM | log EC50f | EC50, nM | Emax,i % | log EC50f | EC50, nM | Emax,i % | MVD(δ) | GPI(μ) | |
1 | −7.03 ± 0.11 | 45 | −7.19 ± 0.30 | 31 | −7.13 ± 0.27 | 74 | 100 | −6.69 ± 0.11 | 210 | 170 | 24 ± 5 | 460 ± 130 |
2 | −8.49 ± 0.11 | 1.4 | −8.92 ± 0.06 | 0.5 | −8.02 ± 0.16 | 9.4 | 64 | −8.02 ± 0.11 | 96 | 82 | 26 ± 5 | 81 ± 21 |
3 | −8.04 ± 0.11 | 3.9 | −6.88 ± 0.09 | 56 | −7.91 ± 0.36 | 13 | 99 | −6.76 ± 0.31 | 17 | 71 | 18 ± 4 | 530 ± 100 |
4 | −8.29 ± 0.12 | 2.2 | −8.10 ± 0.08 | 3.4 | −7.83 ± 0.14 | 15 | 64 | −8.11 ± 0.14 | 7.7 | 82 | 25 ± 7 | 76 ± 9 |
5 | −8.86 ± 0.16 | 0.63 | −6.92 ± 0.08 | 52 | −8.23 ± 0.51 | 5.9 | 120 | −6.20 ± 0.37 | 630 | 63 | 16 ± 2 | 240 ± 40 |
6 | −8.59 ± 0.18 | 1.1 | −7.54 ± 0.16 | 13 | −7.7 ± 0.18 | 19 | 89 | −7.13 ± 0.26 | 75 | 85 | 12 ± 2 | 93 ± 6 |
7 | −7.79 ± 0.09 | 6.9 | −7.10 ± 0.14 | 34 | −8.08 ± 0.07 | 8.4 | 93 | −8.90 ± 0.18 | 1.3 | 106 | 31 ± 5 | 210 ± 50 |
8 | −8.78 ± 0.10 | 0.8 | −8.16 ± 0.10 | 3.0 | −7.68 ± 0.19 | 21 | 48 | −8.73 ± 0.43 | 1.9 | 20 | 15 ± 3 | 97 ± 9 |
biphalin | −8.95 ± 0.17 | 1.1 | 84 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 8.8 ± 0.3 |
Competition analyses were carried out using membrane preparations from transfected HN9.10 cells that constitutively expressed the respective receptor types.
Kd = 0.50 ± 0.1 nM.
Kd = 0.85 ± 0.2 nM.
Expressed from CHO cells.
Concentration at 50% inhibition of muscle contraction at electrically stimulated isolated tissues.
Logarithmic values determined from the nonlinear regression analysis of data collected from at least two independent experiments.
Competition against radiolabeled ligand.
Antilogarithmic value of the respective IC50.
Net total bound/basal binding × 100 ± SEM.