Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4476–4483. doi: 10.1118/1.2795830

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of filtered backprojection and TV-CT reconstruction with irregular and undersampled projections. Filtered backprojection using (a) 210, (b) 140, (c) 70, and (d) 35 random projections. TV-CT reconstruction using (e) 210, (f) 140, (g) 70, and (h) 35 random projections. (i) A line profile comparison extracted from the 70-projection case.