. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 5.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Feb;22(1):11–20. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.11

Table 2.

Within- and Cross-Spouse Bivariate Correlations Between Control, Predictor, and Outcome Variables

	Husbands
Wives	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. M depression	.14	−.45^****	.31^***	.25^*	.48^****	.38^****	−.40^****	−.31^***	−.23^*	−.35^***
2. M support adequacy	−.43^****	.36^****	−.15	−.08	−.14	−.19	.33^***	.40^***	.44^***	.37^***
3. T1 role strain	.21^*	−.03	.06	.44^****	.63^****	.47^****	−.33^***	−.16	−.14	−.16
4. T2 role strain	.20	−.03	.58^****	.10	.63^****	.54^****	−.24^*	−.18	−.12	−.16
5. T3 role strain	.35^***	−.19	.46^****	.34^***	.28^*	.65^****	−.29^**	−.32^***	−.30^**	−.24^*
6. T4 role strain	.35^***	−.02	.49^****	.59^****	.38^***	.28^*	−.26^*	−.14	−.29^*	−.24^*
7. T1 marital satisfaction	−.28^**	.36^****	−.20^*	−.10	−.34^***	−.10	.65^****	.39^****	.44^****	.49^****
8. T2 marital satisfaction	−.34^***	.35^***	−.30^**	−.16	−.27^*	−.09	.52^****	.53^****	.54^****	.37^***
9. T3 marital satisfaction	−.42^****	.43^****	−.15	−.08	−.24^*	−.19	.42^****	.64^****	.53^****	.51^****
10. T4 marital satisfaction	−.41^****	.42^****	−.13	−.10	−.32^**	−.07	.36^***	.55^****	.53^****	.64^****

Note. N = 101 couples. Husbands’ data are above the diagonal. Wives’ data are below the diagonal. Interspousal correlations are in bold along the diagonal. T = time.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .005.

^****

p < .001.