Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Feb;22(1):11–20. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.11

Table 3.

Adequacy of Support Moderating the Link Between Role Strain and Marital Satisfaction: Main and Moderating Effects

Own role strain → Own satisfaction
Partner role strain → Own satisfaction
Variable Coefficient SE ta Effect size r Coefficient SE ta Effect size r
Aim 1: Are rates of change in role strain associated with rates of change in marital satisfaction?
Husband 1.21 0.56 2.18* .22 0.60 0.58 1.04 .10
Wife 0.10 0.70 0.15 .02 2.09 0.57 3.63*** .34

Aim 2: Does support adequacy moderate the association between change in role strain and marital satisfaction?
Husband’s role strain −0.91 0.59 −1.54 .15 0.85 0.60 1.42 .14
 Support adequacyb 0.00 0.02 30.04 .00 −0.02 0.02 −1.26 .13
 Depression symptoms −0.04 0.02 −1.91 .19 −0.07 0.02 −3.06*** .30
Wife’s role strain 0.10 0.77 0.13 .01 1.70 0.59 2.89** .28
 Support adequacyc 0.03 0.01 3.15*** .30 0.03 0.01 2.54* .25
 Depression symptoms 0.03 0.03 1.10 .11 0.02 0.02 0.97 .10

Note. Effect size r = √[t2/(t2 + df)]. Significant findings relevant to specific hypotheses are in bold.

a

Aim 1 df = 100; Aim 2 df = 98.

b

Adequacy of support provided by wives to husbands (as a moderator).

c

Adequacy of support provided by husbands to wives (as a moderator).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .005.