Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;12(10):2291–2302. doi: 10.1110/ps.03131303

Table 4.

Cross-comparison of the overall performance of 3D-PSSM and FUGUE

FUGUE 3D-PSSM GTF A GTF B Othera Not Identifiedb
GTF A 54 (2566) 0 (0) 1 (3) 4 (31)
GTF B 1 (1) 31 (1043) 1 (2) 5 (11)
Other 0 (0) 1 (1) 3 (30) 1 (7)
Not identified 9 (20) 33 (69) 4 (39) 114 (1365)

Figures outside parentheses relate to clusters of GTF sequences. Figures in parentheses relate to sequences.

a The folds other than GTF A/B.

b The top hit from fold recognition is low-confidence, i.e. the top hit from 3D-PSSM with E-val3D-PSSM > 0.05 or the top hit from FUGUE with ZFUGUE < 6.0.