Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):910–918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68381-5

Table 3.

Umbilical cord infection by treatment group


Infants
Cases
Person-time*
Rate
IRR (95% CI)
Algorithm 1: Moderate or severe redness
Chlorhexidine 4·0% 4703 438 4236·1 10·3 0·68 (0·58−0·80)
Soap/water 4884 660 4214·4 15·7 1·03 (0·87−1·22)
Dry cord care 4859 638 4195·6 15·2 1·00
Algorithm 2: Moderate or severe redness, with pus, or severe redness alone
Chlorhexidine 4·0% 4883 147 4675·8 3·1 0·46 (0·36−0·59)
Soap/water 5029 280 4701·6 6·0 0·88 (0·69−1·12)
Dry cord care 5021 315 4651·9 6·8 1·00
Algorithm 3: Severe redness with pus
Chlorhexidine 4·0% 4930 13 4839·4 0·3 0·25 (0·12−0·53)
Soap/water 5096 53 4962·3 1·1 1·01 (0·58−1·77)
Dry cord care 5076 52 4929·6 1·1 1·00
*

Person-time expressed as neonatal periods (28 infant-days).

Incidence expressed as infections per 100 neonatal periods.

Generalised estimating equations (Poisson distribution, log link function) were used to adjust point estimates and CIs for the cluster-randomised design.