Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):910–918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68381-5

Table 4.

Umbilical cord infection by treatment group stratified by timing of intervention and skin cleansing trial intervention

Timing of intervention

Early intervention (• 24 h)
Late intervention (• 24 h)
Algorithm 1: Moderate or severe redness
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.65 (0.56−0.78) 0.70 (0.49−1.01)
Soap/water 1.00 (0.84−1.18) 1.32 (0.93−1.87)
Algorithm 2: Moderate or severe redness, with pus, or severe redness alone
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.42 (0.32−0.54) 0.66 (0.40−1.09)
Soap/water 0.82 (0.64−1.06) 1.19 (0.79−1.81)
Algorithm 3: Severe redness with pus
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.13 (0.06−0.31) 1.06 (0.35−3.20)
Soap/water 1.00 (0.55−1.82) 1.12 (0.37−3.36)
Skin cleansing trial intervention

Chlorhexidine 0.25%
Placebo
Algorithm 1: Moderate or severe redness
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.71 (0.57−0.89) 0.64 (0.51−0.82)
Soap/water 1.00 (0.78−1.27) 1.07 (0.84−1.37)
Algorithm 2: Moderate or severe redness, with pus, or severe redness alone
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.49 (0.35−0.67) 0.43 (0.30−0.62)
Soap/water 0.86 (0.62−1.18) 0.90 (0.62−1.30)
Algorithm 3: Severe redness with pus
Chlorhexidine 4.0% 0.37 (0.16−0.86) 0.12 (0.03−0.58)
Soap/water 1.16 (0.56−2.38) 0.86 (0.36−2.10)

Data are IRR (95% CI) Generalised estimating equations (Poisson distribution, log link function) were used to adjust point estimates and CIs for the cluster-randomised design.