Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 20;36(7):2284–2294. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn064

Table 1.

Comparison of ab initio repeat finders

Tool Run time (mins) Sensitivity (% bp) Portion (% bp) of dataset classified as repetitive Potential novel repeats (% bp) Number of families Average length of family consensus sequence Total bases in consensus sequence library
Simulated reads (650 bp each; Dataset: 3000 Kbp × 6 = 18 000 Kbp)
Recon 3866.17 38.1 25.8 15.7 1291 485 626 157
ReAS 7.14 50.1 15.3 2.1 181 443 80 235
Chromosome segment (Dataset: 3000 Kbp)
RepeatGluer 4.55 99.9 99.3 72.2 38 157 451 5 983 148
RepeatScout 4.76 26.2 7.3 0.3 45 302 13 614
RepeatFinder 0.38 32.7 10.3 1.4 1000 153 153 531
PILER 0.11 0.04 >0.1 0.0 1 420 420
Chromosome (Dataset: 27 757 Kbp)
RepeatScout 112.11 84.3 39.7 4.4 657 860 565 020
RepeatFinder 59.48 85.3 44.6 8.9 25 113 252 6 347 059
PILER 3.45 38.3 17.5 1.4 41 2767 113 473